
I was flipping through the Pittsburgh Business Times recently when I came across an ad with a QR code. This is nothing special since it’s clear both newspapers and magazines are both pushing their advertisers to include QR codes in their ads (this will make your ad digital and stuff!). However, considering the ones I’ve seen, they’re not spending a whole lot of time helping those advertisers use the QR codes effectively.
The ad was for a bank and the title copy read, “… is actively making business loans. Right Now. So call me right now. (phone numbers)”
In the picture above you’ll notice a paragraph with some more text below that includes, again, the phone numbers.
Wait, what’s that to the left? It looks like QR code that might take me to some more information about the loans, rates, or maybe a story about another business this bank helped, which would have all been great uses for a QR code.
Above the QR code it reads – “Download a QR Reader for your smartphone & scan this code to call …”
What? Taking the time to scan the code does the same thing as dialing the number. Wow. And who would go download a QR reader just so their phone can do something it can already do – make a phone call!
This is clearly a QR code for the sake of a QR code. Someone thought it would make the bank seems “hip and cutting-edge” if they had one in their ad. In the end it’s not only a missed opportunity to share more content with smartphone users it makes the bank look the opposite of “hip and cutting-edge”.
Let’s keep in mind somebody approved this ad. Somebody didn’t see anything wrong with this. That’s scary. For the sake of all marketers I hope that person’s title does not have the word “marketing” in it.
I wonder what Scott Stratten would think of this?
What do you think of this?
Solution:


